<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Arab Bank Facts &#187; Filings &amp; Rulings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arabbankfacts.com/category/filings-and-rulings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arabbankfacts.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2018 16:14:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Jesner v. Arab Bank</title>
		<link>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2018/06/supreme-court-upholds-dismissal-of-jesner-v-arab-bank/</link>
		<comments>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2018/06/supreme-court-upholds-dismissal-of-jesner-v-arab-bank/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2018 19:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MasterAdmin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Filings & Rulings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arabbankfacts.com/?p=1836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>On April 24, 2018, the Supreme Court of the United States upheld the dismissal of claims brought under the Alien Tort Statute (ATS) in Jesner v. Arab Bank, concluding that foreign corporations are not proper defendants in suits brought under &#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2018/06/supreme-court-upholds-dismissal-of-jesner-v-arab-bank/">Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Jesner v. Arab Bank</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.arabbankfacts.com">Arab Bank Facts</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2018/06/supreme-court-upholds-dismissal-of-jesner-v-arab-bank/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Second Circuit Overturns Verdict in Linde v. Arab Bank</title>
		<link>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2018/02/second-circuit-overturns-verdict-in-linde-v-arab-bank/</link>
		<comments>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2018/02/second-circuit-overturns-verdict-in-linde-v-arab-bank/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 22:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MasterAdmin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Filings & Rulings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Circuit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arabbankfacts.com/?p=1816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>On February 9, 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit unanimously reversed the District Court’s decision in Linde v. Arab Bank, ruling that the Court erred in failing to provide the jury with adequate instructions.</p>
<p>Read the &#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2018/02/second-circuit-overturns-verdict-in-linde-v-arab-bank/">Second Circuit Overturns Verdict in Linde v. Arab Bank</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.arabbankfacts.com">Arab Bank Facts</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2018/02/second-circuit-overturns-verdict-in-linde-v-arab-bank/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arab Bank and Supporters File Briefs with Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2017/09/arab-bank-and-supporters-file-briefs-with-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2017/09/arab-bank-and-supporters-file-briefs-with-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 15:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MasterAdmin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Filings & Rulings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amicus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCOTUS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arabbankfacts.com/?p=1782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>On August 21, 2017, Arab Bank submitted its brief with the Supreme Court in Jesner et al. v. Arab Bank, PLC. In its brief, the Bank makes its case that the Court should affirm dismissal of the case, a decision &#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2017/09/arab-bank-and-supporters-file-briefs-with-supreme-court/">Arab Bank and Supporters File Briefs with Supreme Court</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.arabbankfacts.com">Arab Bank Facts</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2017/09/arab-bank-and-supporters-file-briefs-with-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arab Bank Files Appeal Reply Brief with Second Circuit Court of Appeals</title>
		<link>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2017/02/arab-bank-files-appeal-reply-brief-with-second-circuit-court-of-appeals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2017/02/arab-bank-files-appeal-reply-brief-with-second-circuit-court-of-appeals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 20:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MasterAdmin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Filings & Rulings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arabbankfacts.com/?p=1774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>On February 15, 2017, Arab Bank filed its reply brief in the appeal of a liability verdict in Linde v. Arab Bank, PLC with the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. In its papers, the Bank argues that the District Court &#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2017/02/arab-bank-files-appeal-reply-brief-with-second-circuit-court-of-appeals/">Arab Bank Files Appeal Reply Brief with Second Circuit Court of Appeals</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.arabbankfacts.com">Arab Bank Facts</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2017/02/arab-bank-files-appeal-reply-brief-with-second-circuit-court-of-appeals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arab Bank Files Appeal Brief with Second Circuit Court of Appeals</title>
		<link>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2016/10/arab-bank-files-appeal-brief-with-second-circuit-court-of-appeals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2016/10/arab-bank-files-appeal-brief-with-second-circuit-court-of-appeals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 15:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MasterAdmin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Filings & Rulings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arabbankfacts.com/?p=1769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>On October 20, 2016, Arab Bank filed an appeal of a liability verdict in Linde v. Arab Bank, PLC with the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. In its papers, the Bank argues that the District Court made several fundamental errors &#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2016/10/arab-bank-files-appeal-brief-with-second-circuit-court-of-appeals/">Arab Bank Files Appeal Brief with Second Circuit Court of Appeals</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.arabbankfacts.com">Arab Bank Facts</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2016/10/arab-bank-files-appeal-brief-with-second-circuit-court-of-appeals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rulings by the District Court in Linde v. Arab Bank</title>
		<link>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/11/rulings-district-court-linde-v-arab-bank/</link>
		<comments>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/11/rulings-district-court-linde-v-arab-bank/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 16:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MasterAdmin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Filings & Rulings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arabbankfacts.com/?p=1648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Throughout the discovery process and during the trial, the Bank has argued that a series of rulings issued by the Linde Court are inconsistent with controlling precedent as well as decisions of other district courts on key legal issues, including &#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/11/rulings-district-court-linde-v-arab-bank/">Rulings by the District Court in Linde v. Arab Bank</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.arabbankfacts.com">Arab Bank Facts</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/11/rulings-district-court-linde-v-arab-bank/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arab Bank Files Motion for Certification for Interlocutory Appeal</title>
		<link>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/11/arab-bank-files-motion-certification-interlocutory-appeal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/11/arab-bank-files-motion-certification-interlocutory-appeal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2014 21:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MasterAdmin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Filings & Rulings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interlocutory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linde]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arabbankfacts.com/?p=1620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>On November 5, 2014, Arab Bank filed a motion for certification for interlocutory appeal in the Linde case, requesting that the Court certify three questions of law for immediate appellate review prior to a costly and lengthy damages trial that &#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/11/arab-bank-files-motion-certification-interlocutory-appeal/">Arab Bank Files Motion for Certification for Interlocutory Appeal</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.arabbankfacts.com">Arab Bank Facts</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/11/arab-bank-files-motion-certification-interlocutory-appeal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arab Bank Files Motion Requesting New Trial</title>
		<link>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/10/arab-bank-files-motion-requesting-new-trial/</link>
		<comments>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/10/arab-bank-files-motion-requesting-new-trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 20:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MasterAdmin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Filings & Rulings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arabbankfacts.com/?p=1592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>On October 10, 2014, Arab Bank filed <a title="Rule 50 Motion" href="http://www.arabbankfacts.com/wp-content/uploads/2014-10-10-Rule-59-Corrected-Memo-of-Law.pdf" target="_blank">a motion for a new trial</a>, arguing the District Court made many serious errors in legal and evidentiary rulings, and in the trial structure, that prejudiced the outcome of the trial. The &#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/10/arab-bank-files-motion-requesting-new-trial/">Arab Bank Files Motion Requesting New Trial</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.arabbankfacts.com">Arab Bank Facts</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/10/arab-bank-files-motion-requesting-new-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arab Bank Files Rule 50 Motion</title>
		<link>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/09/arab-bank-files-rule-50-motion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/09/arab-bank-files-rule-50-motion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2014 20:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MasterAdmin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Filings & Rulings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arabbankfacts.com/?p=1519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>On September 8, 2014, following the completion of the plaintiff’s case, Arab Bank filed a motion (known as a Rule 50 motion) asking the Linde Court to enter judgment as a matter of law in favor of the Bank because &#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/09/arab-bank-files-rule-50-motion/">Arab Bank Files Rule 50 Motion</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.arabbankfacts.com">Arab Bank Facts</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/09/arab-bank-files-rule-50-motion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arab Bank Files Brief Concurring with U.S. Government’s Criticism of Sanctions</title>
		<link>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/06/arab-bank-files-brief-concurring-with-u-s-governments-criticism-of-sanctions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/06/arab-bank-files-brief-concurring-with-u-s-governments-criticism-of-sanctions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2014 14:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MasterAdmin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Filings & Rulings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCOTUS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arabbankfacts.com/?p=1349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>On June 10, 2014 Arab Bank filed a supplement brief in support of the Bank’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari in Linde v. Arab Bank, PLC concurring with the U.S. Government’s comprehensive critique of the sanctions imposed on the Bank. &#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/06/arab-bank-files-brief-concurring-with-u-s-governments-criticism-of-sanctions/">Arab Bank Files Brief Concurring with U.S. Government’s Criticism of Sanctions</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.arabbankfacts.com">Arab Bank Facts</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/06/arab-bank-files-brief-concurring-with-u-s-governments-criticism-of-sanctions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
