<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Arab Bank Facts &#187; SCOTUS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arabbankfacts.com/tag/scotus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arabbankfacts.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 13:46:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Arab Bank and Supporters File Briefs with Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2017/09/arab-bank-and-supporters-file-briefs-with-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2017/09/arab-bank-and-supporters-file-briefs-with-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 15:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MasterAdmin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Filings & Rulings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amicus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCOTUS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arabbankfacts.com/?p=1782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>On August 21, 2017, Arab Bank submitted its brief with the Supreme Court in Jesner et al. v. Arab Bank, PLC. In its brief, the Bank makes its case that the Court should affirm dismissal of the case, a decision &#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2017/09/arab-bank-and-supporters-file-briefs-with-supreme-court/">Arab Bank and Supporters File Briefs with Supreme Court</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.arabbankfacts.com">Arab Bank Facts</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2017/09/arab-bank-and-supporters-file-briefs-with-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court won&#8217;t save Arab Bank from terror trial</title>
		<link>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/07/supreme-court-wont-save-arab-bank-from-terror-trial/</link>
		<comments>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/07/supreme-court-wont-save-arab-bank-from-terror-trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2014 16:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MasterAdmin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCOTUS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arabbankfacts.com/?p=1383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Fortune<br />
July 1, 2014<br />
Roger Parloff</p>
<p>The largest financial institution in Jordan—a nation the State Department terms an “invaluable partner” in the war on terror—faces a billion-dollar civil jury trial for allegedly financing terror attacks in Israel, Gaza, and the &#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/07/supreme-court-wont-save-arab-bank-from-terror-trial/">Supreme Court won&#8217;t save Arab Bank from terror trial</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.arabbankfacts.com">Arab Bank Facts</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/07/supreme-court-wont-save-arab-bank-from-terror-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Declines to Review Sanctions Against Arab Bank in Records Case</title>
		<link>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/06/supreme-court-declines-to-review-sanctions-against-arab-bank-in-records-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/06/supreme-court-declines-to-review-sanctions-against-arab-bank-in-records-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MasterAdmin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCOTUS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arabbankfacts.com/?p=1379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Wall Street Journal<br />
June 30, 2014<br />
Brent Kendall</p>
<p>The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to review legal sanctions against Arab Bank PLC for not turning over certain bank records in litigation with terrorism victims.</p>
<p>The plaintiffs are victims, or &#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/06/supreme-court-declines-to-review-sanctions-against-arab-bank-in-records-case/">Supreme Court Declines to Review Sanctions Against Arab Bank in Records Case</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.arabbankfacts.com">Arab Bank Facts</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/06/supreme-court-declines-to-review-sanctions-against-arab-bank-in-records-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arab Bank&#8217;s response to U.S. Supreme Court’s Decision in Linde v. Arab Bank, PLC</title>
		<link>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/06/arab-banks-response-to-u-s-supreme-courts-decision-in-linde-v-arab-bank-plc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/06/arab-banks-response-to-u-s-supreme-courts-decision-in-linde-v-arab-bank-plc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MasterAdmin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Statements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCOTUS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arabbankfacts.com/?p=1373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Arab Bank released the following statement in response to today’s U.S. Supreme Court decision denying the Bank’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari in Linde v. Arab Bank, PLC. The Bank’s petition asked the Court to review whether the Second Circuit &#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/06/arab-banks-response-to-u-s-supreme-courts-decision-in-linde-v-arab-bank-plc/">Arab Bank&#8217;s response to U.S. Supreme Court’s Decision in Linde v. Arab Bank, PLC</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.arabbankfacts.com">Arab Bank Facts</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/06/arab-banks-response-to-u-s-supreme-courts-decision-in-linde-v-arab-bank-plc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Let Global Banking Bloom</title>
		<link>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/06/let-global-banking-bloom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/06/let-global-banking-bloom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2014 15:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MasterAdmin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCOTUS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arabbankfacts.com/?p=1364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>National Review Online<br />
June 25, 2014<br />
C. Dean McGrath, Jr.</p>
<p>The Framers of our Constitution wisely gave control of foreign policy to the political branches — the president and Congress. By and large, the judiciary was not part of the &#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/06/let-global-banking-bloom/">Let Global Banking Bloom</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.arabbankfacts.com">Arab Bank Facts</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/06/let-global-banking-bloom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When trial lawyers do foreign policy</title>
		<link>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/06/when-trial-lawyers-do-foreign-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/06/when-trial-lawyers-do-foreign-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2014 15:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MasterAdmin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCOTUS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arabbankfacts.com/?p=1360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Washington Times<br />
June 24, 2014<br />
Edward Gnehm, former</p>
<p>U.S. Ambassador to Jordan Actions have consequences, and sometimes those consequences are both unanticipated and potentially disastrous. This may be the case as the result of a recent federal court ruling that &#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/06/when-trial-lawyers-do-foreign-policy/">When trial lawyers do foreign policy</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.arabbankfacts.com">Arab Bank Facts</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/06/when-trial-lawyers-do-foreign-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arab Bank Files Brief Concurring with U.S. Government’s Criticism of Sanctions</title>
		<link>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/06/arab-bank-files-brief-concurring-with-u-s-governments-criticism-of-sanctions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/06/arab-bank-files-brief-concurring-with-u-s-governments-criticism-of-sanctions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2014 14:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MasterAdmin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Filings & Rulings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCOTUS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arabbankfacts.com/?p=1349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>On June 10, 2014 Arab Bank filed a supplement brief in support of the Bank’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari in Linde v. Arab Bank, PLC concurring with the U.S. Government’s comprehensive critique of the sanctions imposed on the Bank. &#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/06/arab-bank-files-brief-concurring-with-u-s-governments-criticism-of-sanctions/">Arab Bank Files Brief Concurring with U.S. Government’s Criticism of Sanctions</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.arabbankfacts.com">Arab Bank Facts</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/06/arab-bank-files-brief-concurring-with-u-s-governments-criticism-of-sanctions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US backs terrorism finance case proceeding</title>
		<link>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/05/us-backs-terrorism-finance-case-proceeding/</link>
		<comments>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/05/us-backs-terrorism-finance-case-proceeding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2014 18:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MasterAdmin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCOTUS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arabbankfacts.com/?p=1303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Jerusalem Post<br />
May 28, 2014<br />
Yonah Jeremy Bob</p>
<p>In a major decision that will affect the high-profile Arab Bank terrorism finance case in the US and the future of terrorism financing cases, the US government has told the US Supreme &#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/05/us-backs-terrorism-finance-case-proceeding/">US backs terrorism finance case proceeding</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.arabbankfacts.com">Arab Bank Facts</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/05/us-backs-terrorism-finance-case-proceeding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amid Split on Bank Case, U.S. Seeks a Middle Path</title>
		<link>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/05/amid-split-on-bank-case-u-s-seeks-a-middle-path/</link>
		<comments>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/05/amid-split-on-bank-case-u-s-seeks-a-middle-path/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2014 19:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MasterAdmin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCOTUS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arabbankfacts.com/?p=1285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>New York Times<br />
May 27, 2014<br />
Charlie Savage</p>
<p class="p1">WASHINGTON — Solicitor General Donald B. Verrilli Jr. faced a legal and bureaucratic dilemma this year: Obama administration officials could not agree about what he should tell the Supreme Court about a &#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/05/amid-split-on-bank-case-u-s-seeks-a-middle-path/">Amid Split on Bank Case, U.S. Seeks a Middle Path</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.arabbankfacts.com">Arab Bank Facts</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/05/amid-split-on-bank-case-u-s-seeks-a-middle-path/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Terrorism as an excuse for lawyers to loot global banks</title>
		<link>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/05/terrorism-as-an-excuse-for-lawyers-to-loot-global-banks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/05/terrorism-as-an-excuse-for-lawyers-to-loot-global-banks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2014 13:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MasterAdmin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCOTUS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arabbankfacts.com/?p=1231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>New York Post<br />
May 1, 2014<br />
Norman Lamont</p>
<p>Can American trial lawyers use US courts to legally blackmail foreign banks? The US Solicitor General — to whom the Supreme Court has turned for advice — is now considering whether the &#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/05/terrorism-as-an-excuse-for-lawyers-to-loot-global-banks/">Terrorism as an excuse for lawyers to loot global banks</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.arabbankfacts.com">Arab Bank Facts</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.arabbankfacts.com/2014/05/terrorism-as-an-excuse-for-lawyers-to-loot-global-banks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
